About

Fernando Giannotti is a writer, economist, and comedian from Dayton, Ohio. He is a member of the comedy troupe '5 Barely Employable Guys.' He holds a B.A. in Economics and History and an M.S. in Finance from Vanderbilt University as well as a B.A. in the Liberal Arts from Hauss College. A self-labeled doctor of cryptozoology, he continues to live the gonzo-transcendentalist lifestyle and strives to live an examined life.

Tuesday, August 27, 2024

Reimagining the Clinton Presidency: What If Different Choices Had Shaped a Better World?

 The presidency of Bill Clinton was marked by significant achievements, including economic prosperity and diplomatic successes. However, history often leaves us wondering what might have been had different choices been made at crucial junctures. In particular, several key decisions during Clinton’s tenure could have dramatically altered the geopolitical and economic landscape of today’s world. What if the United States, alongside Western Europe, had organized a Marshall Plan for Russia and Eastern Europe after the collapse of the Soviet Union? What if Clinton had used the budget surplus of the 1990s to pay down the national debt instead of creating a middle-class tax cut? And what if Clinton had demanded democratic political concessions from China in exchange for entry into the World Trade Organization (WTO)? By exploring these alternative scenarios, we can imagine a world that might have been more stable, prosperous, and democratic.

Addressing the Crisis of Illegal Immigration in the United States: A Comprehensive Plan for Reform

 The United States is currently grappling with a significant influx of illegal immigrants and asylum seekers, particularly along its southern border with Mexico. This situation presents a complex and multifaceted challenge, with tens of millions of illegal immigrants already residing within the country. Historically, the United States has been a nation that welcomes immigrants and assimilates them successfully into its social fabric. However, illegal immigration poses distinct problems that differ from those associated with legal immigration. These issues include the strain on public services and infrastructure, distortions in the labor and housing markets, and broader challenges to the nation’s legal and economic systems. To address this crisis effectively, a comprehensive approach is necessary—one that respects human rights, ensures fairness, and is rooted in practical solutions.

Monday, August 26, 2024

Addressing Political Polarization in the United States: A Call for Unity Around Shared Values

 Political polarization has become a defining feature of contemporary American society, with citizens increasingly divided along ideological lines. This growing divide is evident in the heightened animosity between political parties, the contentious nature of public discourse, and the stark differences in how Americans perceive key issues. The causes of this polarization are complex and multifaceted, with several contributing factors driving the wedge deeper between opposing sides. To address this pressing issue, it is essential to understand the underlying causes and focus on solutions that emphasize shared values and common ground.

The Future of Mars Colonization: Driven by the Asteroid Belt's Riches

 Mars, the fourth planet from the Sun, has long captured the imagination of scientists, governments, and the public as a potential site for human colonization. Initial missions to Mars will likely follow the precedent set by the NASA Apollo missions to the Moon in the 1960s—government-sponsored scientific endeavors aimed at exploration and discovery. However, beyond these initial exploratory missions, the idea of large-scale human migration to Mars is far less likely to materialize in the near future. The immense cost, combined with the severe inconveniences and dangers of living on Mars, would not justify such an endeavor without a significant financial incentive. This essay explores the factors that could realistically drive the colonization of Mars, focusing on the economic and logistical advantages linked to the mining of the asteroid belt.

Philosophical Educational Reform

 Adapting to Rapid Technological Change: The Need for Lifelong Learning and Educational Reform in the United States 


        In recent decades, the pace of technological advancement has accelerated at an unprecedented rate, fundamentally transforming industries, economies, and societies worldwide. The emergence and integration of machine learning, artificial intelligence, and automation into various sectors have further accelerated this change, presenting significant challenges for the workforce, particularly for educated workers. As technology evolves, the skills and knowledge that once provided job security can quickly become obsolete, leading to a growing number of workers who find themselves either underemployed or unemployed as their roles are automated or outsourced. This rapid shift in the employment landscape underscores the urgent need for a transformative approach to education in the United States—one that emphasizes lifelong learning and provides accessible, affordable opportunities for adults to acquire new skills and knowledge.

Notes On an Optimal National Framework for Healthcare

 Notes On National Framework for Healthcare


        The current iteration of the United States healthcare law, the Affordable Healthcare Act (signed into law in 2010) was an admirable (in aspiration) attempt at creating a national healthcare framework that would achieve universal health insurance coverage.  It is admirable in its intentions but not its execution.  The Affordable Healthcare Act of 2010 is a deeply flawed law that does not adequately address several core issues of the healthcare debate in a realistic fashion.  The Affordable Healthcare Act is at best a bad patch on an already bad system.  In addition to being inadequate for our healthcare demands it may have many negative consequences in many aspects of the United States economy and further divisions in American society.   If the United States wants to move forward with the Affordable Healthcare Act, many changes of a radical nature will need to be implemented in the near future in order to make the practical application of the law live up to the admirable goals of those who authored the Affordable Healthcare Act.  Or the United States will need to produce a new, separate law to address our national healthcare concerns, in the process making the Affordable Healthcare Act a worthy attempt assigned to the historical scrap heap.  If the United States is serious about addressing its myriad healthcare concerns, one of the two above prescribed courses of action will need to unfold.  Given the relative weakness and deep structural flaws of the current Affordable Healthcare Act, I advocate a completely new law to address our nation’s healthcare concerns structured very differently from the Affordable Healthcare Act.  I will discuss our current national healthcare concerns and challenges confronting the United States, then outline the structural and societal deficiencies and merits of the Affordable Healthcare Act, and finally I will outline a general proposal for a framework of guidelines for a new national healthcare system.  I want to iterate again, that these are ideas worth discussing and that they should not be taken as a finished product that is actionable in any way.