About

Fernando Giannotti is a writer, economist, and comedian from Dayton, Ohio. He is a member of the comedy troupe '5 Barely Employable Guys.' He holds a B.A. in Economics and History and an M.S. in Finance from Vanderbilt University as well as a B.A. in the Liberal Arts from Hauss College. A self-labeled doctor of cryptozoology, he continues to live the gonzo-transcendentalist lifestyle and strives to live an examined life.

Tuesday, July 29, 2014

Gonzo Notes - Restaurants Visited During SXSW Trip 2014

Restaurants Visited Texas Trip

Austin
-Scorchy's tacos
-P Terry's hamburger stand
-Roppolo's pizza
-Stubb's bbq
-Magnolia Café
-Gourdough's big fat donuts.  Donuts eaten - Mother clicker, flying pig, mama's cakes, blue balls, baby rattler.
-Kirby lane cafe.
-John Mueller's meat co.
-Cherrywood coffee house.
-Blue Dahlia
-Salty Sow

Houston
-Anvil
-Brazil, restaurant and coffee house.  Ordered pepper sausage quiche and tamales.  And a Mexican mocha, uses better chocolate apparently. 
-Dolce Vita
-El Tiempo
-Blacksmith coffee shop
-Goode company bbq

Ft. Worth
-The Bird café

Gonzo Notes - Restaurants Visited on Sundance Trip 2014

Restaurants Visited Sundance Trip

Kansas City

-Oklahoma Joe’s

Salt Lake City
-Red Iguana
-Bruges Waffles and Fries
-Crown Burger
-The Pie Hole

Casper, Wyoming
-Eggington’s

Rapid City, South Dakota
-Independent Ale House


Gonzo Notes - Fear and Loathing on the Way to Sundance 2014

Fear and Loathing on the way to Sundance - Ohio, Kentucky, Tennessee, Missouri, Kansas, Colorado, Utah, Wyoming, South Dakota, Iowa, Illinois, Indiana

-Just started off my trip. Freezing. Negative 5 below. With wind chill -22. Racing to get down and time. Missing the BC S national championship game. Hoping to get down in time before my friends apartment before he goes to sleep. Wind is brutal shaking the car. Cold maybe Low tire pressure. Gotta keep going on. Always pressure on these trips. Down to Nashville. Wouldn't have it any other way makes it exciting.
-944pm, Monday night.  Auburn is up on Florida state.  I just stopped at a rural gas station in Kentucky.  It was quite in disrepair except for the bathroom.  It had new clean tile, toilet and sink.  I've noticed this about gas stations in Kentucky the past few months  travelling.  They seem to be getting gas station bathrooms right.  Way to improve Kentucky.
-Just passed the giant adult bookstore Kentucky. Looks like a strip mall. But it only has one store one giant adult book store. Should say bookstores adult entertainment? From the right angle the highway you can see in. And catch flashing lights command of the inside. What an odd place to put an adult emporium? Or perhaps pure genius. Either way one of the Great American. Roadside attractions.
-Just passed giant T Rex. Holding a sign for dinosaur world Kentucky. Another Great American roadside stop. Damn had something better for that.

Gonzo Notes - Fear and Loathing on the Trail to SXSW and Back Again 2014

Fear and Loathing on the Trail to SXSW and back again - Ohio, Kentucky, Tennessee, Arkansas, Texas, and Back  

-there has been fog and often thick fog the entire way to Memphis so far.
-not a good sign all ready.  Two thirds the way to Memphis from Nashville and am already seeing shadows and objects that aren't there.  It was inevitable that this would happen, just alarming that its happening so soon.  Where will this end for me?  Does everything finally come home to roost?  A vicious rapture of retribution?  Pulling all my insecurities towards the heavens for all to judge, torturing me until they are violently hurdled back towards my heart, killing me with a calm, laughing, hissing demeanor my fears and insecurities.  I've killed myself, abandoned self restraint in the name of experiencing the real, unadulterated, authentic life, consumed myself, death would be a release, a cowardly selfish shift of blame.  46 miles to Memphis.
-in Memphis, saw what looks like a chain restaurant called Danver's.  Do beavers frequent this establishment?  Do beavers own this establishment?  Did a gregarious beaver named Dan start this restaurant and then franchise it out to other beavers?  What is Dan's disposition?  His philosophical outlook on life and profit motive?  Does he support Obamacare?  Who is this beaver?  Must we find him?
-at my friends beautiful home in Memphis.  I'm sitting at the gated entrance of his home, which is impressive because I am already inside a gated community.  Its quote large and ornate.  Luxurious.  Imposing. 
-went to the Germantown Commissary for diner.  Had pulled pork and ribs with BBQ beans tea and banana pudding.  Quite delicious

Gonzo Notes - Fear and Loathing in Kentucky Part 2

F and L in Kentucky, Tennessee, Georgia (July 24, 2013) 

-saw a gas station attendant north of Louisville who looks exactly like a sexual predator.  Bald, and creepy as fuck.  His name is Doug and he has a pedo-stash.
-weird places are these rest stops in flyover states.  Weird vibe, its 10pm and about 15 people mulling around outside.  Many look like they are contemplating suicide or in some intense Zen state of awareness that I can only hope to obtain.  Two guys outside on park bench with computers conducting logistics work.  Interesting.  If we all had more money we'd have flown.  Rest stops the ultimate refuge of the real hustler.   in the lobby of the rest area is a large free standing plastic case with an advertisement and information about kangaroos.  Just 110 miles north of Nashville in Kentucky.
-Friday, 405pm.  Leaving Nashville for Atlanta.  While still a bit outside of Nashville, saw a truck towing a flatbed trailer with mountains of watermelons stacked in what looked like flimsy cardboard boxes. Any cardboard boxes stacked horizontally and vertically.  I really wanted them to fall off the truck, come cascading off, cartoon style.


Gonzo Notes - Fear and Loathing in Kentucky Part 1

Fear and Loathing in Kentucky Part 1

-may 2, 10pm, currently at a loves gas station somewhere in the dismal waste land between Louisville and cincinnati.  The road is completely fucked, backed up for hours.  Got off at loves exit, many others had the same idea.  So many people just hanging out and chatting, it's a bit lively actually.  Random assortment of people here.  Fat asian guy to my right drinking two cartons on milk.  Kind of hot girl, the kind of hot that comes from working out a lot.  Black dude with three foot dreds.Odd juxstoposition of music - alternates from backstreet boys and james morrison.  In the right pissed off/ relieved state to enjoy this.  Prognosis - not god, slipping closer and closer towards the edge....
 

Lost most of what I wrote because my shit bb crashed again.  Two police cars pulled up.  Its over. 

UPS guy and a family, probably homeless next to me.  Probably I've in there car.  Father told his kids that he bought them honey buns to eat the next morning.  That's sad.  This place and this night keep getting weirder.  I really need to get home or get some sleep.  I'm. Teetering on the edge.
Just walked outside.  There are a bunch of fat white trash girls fighting over something at the pump.  One girl just slapped the other girl.  Now the other girl is talking about how the other one is to be on jail.  And the whole time the loud speaker is urging people to move on and remain calm in an orderly fashion.  Maybe I should rethink my opposition to reality television and soap operas.  This is quite entertaining.  What has become of me.  Why is this place making me question how I think and how I love my life.  Fear and loathing in Kentucky.  Crazy.  Five people to my left watching.  Its a speckle.  One guy is running up with his phone to record it.  Am I off the edge.  What has happened here tonight?  Now the police are booking the two girls, I'm sure diabetes will do the rest.  Better get back on the road.  Nothing better than driving when you've gone off the edge.


Gonzo Notes - Bonnaroo 2013

Bonnaroo 2013 Notes

Friday 2013
-got to bonnaroo late.  About 7pm tonight.  Trying to find Brennan in this jungle.  Right by my car I saw two lesbian girls having sex.  Were ok attractive.  Good way to start off bonnaroo.
-overheard a girl.  Just blurted out at a guy.  "what's that documentary called?"
-breathing in the smell of marijuana.  Waiting for Paul McCarthy to come on.  Brennan just put together a two pointed chair, so prepared.  First hot dogs, Gatorade, now a two legged chair.  Crazy.  Still no sign of molly.  The watch continues.
-a little high.  Group with multicolored neon gallons that are glowing.  Moving them around pleasingly.  Warmly. 
-Paul McCarthy's still got it.  I mean literally, he's still got it.  Using a guitar from the 60's and from the original recording.
-1027pm, we're all puppets now
-its still early in bonnaroo, hard to gage what is going on.  People are still so exuberant, tolerant, optimistic, we haven't recked anything yet.  The smell in the air(besides the weed), is palpable.  Its a kind of careful, precarious, carelessness/abandon.  The feeling that anything is possible, that there are hurdles, but it doesn't matter, nothing matters.  All that matters is that we're here.  Out collective energy, you can't see it, but it will produce the wave we can ride.  Our energy will carry us through.  We're not thinking or planning, that would dull our energy.  Our energy will solve all those vague problems, the idea that we're on the right side of history.  Everything will somehow work out, I will somehow find Molly in this crowd of over 50,000.  We'll see how far the wave takes us to shore.  It may be years, but will find out if it crested to soon, or not at all. 
-Brennan just shouted "just got paid"
-crowd getting anxious for zz top.  Chanting.  Getting bit rowdy.
-little kid of all about 6 is getting down in his light up shoes.  He's braking out the break dancing moves.
-just saw some guy with a bacon strips t-shirt covered head to toe in glitter.
-don't zz stop
-just overheard two hipsters talking about Toms shoes and what they wanted to do that was just like it.  Then the guys was like, "whoa, you realize I'm wearing Toms shows right now."
-at pretty lights.  Really tired.  The lights and lasers are so intense.  The guy right next to me on my right is juggling these really intense light circles that keep changing.  Its right in my peripheral line and killing me kindly.  They are nit gloves with lights at the finger tips.  Another person asked to see them.  The guy to my right said he's triping so hard, he 'needs' them.  He's on the edge.  Where does that leave me? Disorientation at bonnaroo.  Strange smells, weed and strong expresso.
-crazy flags and idols on sticks.  Buzzlightyear, the grim reaper, blue angle jet, eagles, dinosaurs.  What does it all mean in the lights?  Doesn't matter march on.
-giant Parachute, like the one we use to have in grade school gym.  People using it the same way, just high.  No games, just the thrill of having a parachute.
-psychedelic Christmas light up barn that beckons all that walk by.  Strange dj/edm/line dancing inside.  What is this place.  Lots of hot blond girls.  What can this place not produce and I'm mostly sober.

Sunday, July 27, 2014

Justification for Some Degree of a Socialist State

Justification for Some Degree of a Socialist State

            Often I have encountered individuals who hold very firm and passionate philosophical views on the nature of political systems.  Rarely, upon further questioning, have I found the majority of individuals to possess the ability to explain why they hold these passionate philosophical views on the nature of political systems.  Simply put, many feel very strongly about the importance of their political philosophy without being able to explain why.  One could hold a very strong belief in the importance of government welfare programs without being able to justify having government programs as a concept.  Upon rumination, I wondered if perhaps I could explain my own views.  The essay that follows is a running serious of thoughts designed at examining a society, individuals within that society, and the role of a government in a society and any responsibilities to the individual a government may have.  Again this essay is a though exercise and not a definite view of society or an expression of my views.  At the end of the though experiment in this essay, I came to see the need for government programs as well as free market competition.  Both vital and both need the other. 

Voting on Same Sex Marriage

Voting on Same Sex Marriage

            I don’t have to tell any reader about the attention surrounding the issue popularly known as gay marriage.  With the Supreme Court is currently hearing the California Prop 8 challenge, every media outlet and partisan hack has been commenting, one way or another, on gay marriage and its possible ramifications for American society.  Will it open the flood gates for all kinds of marriage or will it normalize the virtual relationships, identical to traditional marriages in all but name, that many Americans have long been involved?  Will we finally give homosexuals the basic civil rights that they have long been denied?  These are certainly important questions, but I can’t help but wonder if we are overlooking the most important question of all that seems to be lost in the whole California Prop 8 spectacle, should we even be voting a person’s civil rights?  Should we put a person’s civil rights up to a popular vote, as we have done in California with Prop 8?  Should a minority’s civil rights be at the mercy of popular opinion and the tyranny of the majority?  The answers to these questions lie in definitively defining freedom of sexuality, and by extension gay marriage, as a civil right, and in our own, American history with civil rights.  At this point, overwhelming consensus is that sexuality is a civil right. 

National Debt

National Debt

            Most conversations revolving around the United States’ national debt and any plan to pay off the national debt are influenced too heavily by political considerations and do not take into effect enough economic or long-term thinking.  While this is understandable, it is not productive for the United States reducing its debt burdening in an effective, responsible way.  Too often conservatives boldly speak of paying down the national debt within a ten year time span, only made possible with truly draconian spending cuts, while liberals fail to give any significant attention to the United States’ ballooning national debt.  I will make several general proposals that will constitute the basic framework for a plan to responsibility pay off the national debt of the United States within a reasonable time frame[1].

Tax Structure

Tax Structure

In the future the United States will be constrained financially with paying down its considerable debt and paying increasing medical costs for retiring baby boomers.  In this new world of financial constraint, it will be important for the United States to be as efficient as possible with its resources.  Efficiency will be more important than quantity.  From my analysis, and I am not alone, the United States tax code leaves much to be desired.   In addition to being the longest document in human history, the United States tax code is very inefficient at utilizing the resources of the United States.  The current United States tax code and larger tax system is horribly inefficient for raising revenue, contributes to the lobbying phenomena of elected public servants, hinders the efficient allocation of capital, and is disadvantageous to those without a financial education and those who can afford financial counseling.  I believe to assuage these problems, the United States should move towards a tax system that utilizes a flat tax, both for income and corporate income.  The United States should also adopt a federal sales tax to be applied on top of state sales taxes as well.  The adoption of a combination flat tax and national sales tax will put the United States on found financial footing, will represent the most significant effort to contain lobbying in the modern era, make the tax system more accessible to citizens by reducing the financial education bias, and helps facilitate efficient allocation of capital.   

Gun Control

Gun Control

            Few areas of discussion are more divisive and provoke stronger reactions than the current debate about gun control and the legal status of firearms in the United States.  A partly subjective debate about the interpretation and limits of the 2th amendment to the Constitution seems never ending with few chances of compromise on the horizon.  After the horrific events of Sandy Hook, Aura, and other tragic shootings, the call for gun control in the United States is perhaps nearing an apex.  In the spirit of this series of essays, I will argue that the current gun control debate within the United States does not address the core gun control issues that affect the vast majority of people and shooting deaths within the United States.  I will argue that the current debate does not discuss or aim to correct the fact that the overwhelming majority of gun crimes within the US involve illegally obtained guns, over 80%.  In addition I will also make a case for a political compromise that both the current moderate right and left can endorse that addresses the core issues behind most shooting incidents and specifically the shooting incidents that happen every day in America’s inner cities.  Before I continue, I would like to make an appeal to logic and to not become beholden to anecdotal evidence.  This author believes that any gun control measure that does not address the horrific state of illegal guns in the United States is a pyrrhic victory at best.

Healthcare

Healthcare

            The current healthcare law, the Affordable Healthcare Act[1] passed in 2010, is an admirable attempt at creating a national healthcare system that achieves universal coverage in a sustainable and nationally affordable way.  It is admirable in its intentions but not its execution.  The Affordable Healthcare Act of 2010 is a deeply flawed law that does not adequately address several core issues of the healthcare debate in a realistic fashion.  The Affordable Healthcare Act is at best a bad patch on an already bad system.  In addition to being inadequate for our healthcare demands it may have many negative consequences in many aspects of the United States economy and further divisions in American society.   If the United States wants to move forward with the Affordable Healthcare Act, many changes of a radical nature will need to be implemented in the near future in order to make the practical application of the law live up to the admirable goals of those who authored the Affordable Healthcare Act.  Or the United States will need to produce a new, separate law to address our national healthcare concerns, in the process making the Affordable Healthcare Act a worthy attempt assigned to the historical scrap heap.  If the United States is serious about addressing its myriad healthcare concerns, one of the two above prescribed courses of action will need to unfold.  Given the relative weakness and deep structural flaws of the current Affordable Healthcare Act, I advocate a completely new law to address our nation’s healthcare concerns structured very differently from the Affordable Healthcare Act.  I will discuss our current national healthcare concerns and challenges confronting the United States, then outline the structural and societal deficiencies and merits of the Affordable Healthcare Act, and finally I will outline a general proposal for a framework of guidelines for a new national healthcare system.  I want to iterate again, that these are ideas worth discussing and that they should not be taken as a finished product that is actionable in any way.

Education

Education

            The United States education system presents a myriad of problems in enacting system wide reform, primarily stemming from extreme decentralization and localization as well as being funded by a variety of different methods.  Given these challenges to reform, I will divide any advocacy for education reform programs into two distinct groups; those relating to kindergarten through high school education and those relating to university education.  Given the extreme localization of our education system, I will further divide responsibilities and capacity for reasonable reform measures between local governments, state governments, federal governments, and combinations of the three governments.  Within these guises I will propose a few measures and general policy focuses to improve the quality of education for children and young adults in the United States.  I will argue for a new generation of land grant colleges specializing in computer science and technology to provide affordable university education in areas of current and future American economic need.  Next I will argue for a new orientation of education programs with a primary aim of intertwining families in the education process from the earliest age of students.  Finally I will argue for the federal government to withhold funding for a variety of projects to states until the states force local communities, which provide most individual school funding, to raise more revenue for their local school systems themselves.[1]  In return the federal government will provide more funding to states and thus to local communities for schools which will partially aide in the increase of revenue from each localities citizens.  If these steps prescribed are enacted I believe we can increase the education and thus the capacities of the American workforce to not only endure, but thrive in the globally competitive world.

Immigration Reform

Immigration Reform

            Current United States immigration policy must address two primary areas of concern; one area of long-term structural importance to United States immigration policy and the other area of a stand-alone, one off incident that achieves most attention and news coverage. The first immigration policy area of concern that is of long-term structural importance to the United States deals with the kind of immigrants our system attracts and allows to immigrate.  Our current immigration policy does not place enough emphasis on attracting and retaining educated and highly skilled immigrants and foreign students studying in the United States.  The current policy’s lack of ability to attract and retain educated and skilled immigrants places the United States at a competitive disadvantage in comparison to other developed countries with more progressive immigration systems such as Canada and Australia.  Even if the United States is able to educate its own citizens to meet the requirements of a more technology based economy, which it is not currently doing, the results from education will take ten years or more to manifest.  The United States needs educated and skilled immigrants for the economy to thrive in the short and intermediate terms until gains in our education system can take effect. The second immigration policy area of concern is dealing with the approximately 12 million people who have entered and now reside in the United States illegally.  While these 12 million people are a side issue to long-term structural immigration policy reform, their situation has captivated and occupied the lion share of media coverage on any immigration debate and become the all-encompassing center of any proposed immigration debate in the United States federal government.  Without addressing the issues of the 12 million people illegally residing in the United States, enacting long-term structural reform that will allow the United States to compete internationally for the workers its economy needs will not be possible.  The United States must provide a solution that brings these 12 million illegal residents out of the shadows, allows them to contribute to the mainstream economy, and address the cause of the massive 12 million illegal resident problems. 

An Appeal to Pragmatism

Appeal to Pragmatism

            This collection of essays evolved over a year long period of rural living which left me much time for contemplation and rumination.  I had the great luxury of time, time to read in a serious way and be engrossed in politics and political discussions.  These essays were born out of a larger question of why to advocate certain political ideas, why being the operative word.  Throughout time spent on reading, watching, discussing, and contemplating, a common theme started to emerge.  I believe that American politics and political discussions have become too ideological, that is our cognition has become centered on ideology.  Our elected public servants[1] and our political discussions have become beholden to ideology, it has poisoned our ability to think critically about issues and problems.  We no longer seek to find the most effective solution to our problems, but to find the solution that fits our predisposed ideology.  In short we have lost our ability to objectively analysis problems, to compromise, and be pragmatic in our solutions.  United States elected public servants, political commentators, and each citizen would gain much by adopting more objective, pragmatic ways of thinking and analyzing problems.  I believe the United States will be able to craft better policies and solutions to the myriad of problems it is currently confronting be adopting a more pragmatic approach to policy making.  This collection of essays is an appeal to pragmatism for the United States.
            A significant downside to a lack of pragmatic thinking in the United States is that it produces policy solutions that do not have the best interests of the United States at heart.  We are not asking the question, “What is the most effective policy for the United States?” but rather, “What is the most effective policy for the United States that fits my preexisting political ideology?”  This method of thinking prioritizes political ideology over the most effective solution to the problem in question.  The desire of finding a solution within or that conforms to a political ideology overshadows the desire of finding the most effective solution for the United States.  Prioritizing political ideology causes our elected public servants to limit the spectrum of their possible solutions, usually to either left or right ideology.  It eliminates the possibility of a hybrid solution to a problem that employs both left and right ideology.  The elected public servants of the United States need to be less beholden to ideology and more pragmatic in crafting solution to our problems.              
            In addition to our elected officials crafting pragmatic solutions to problems, we need political commentary and general public debate[2] to be less beholden to ideology and think more pragmatically.  Being so beholden to political ideology has rendered public debate in the United States virtually nonexistent.  Non-eristic debate is about the process of discovering or uncovering a truth.  The end goal of non-eristic debate is truth.  Our public debates in the United States have become too eristic; they are about proving a point or persuading others to one’s argument.  For example, presidential debates are more about candidates being perceived a certain way and outlining why a particular political position is better than their opponents.  A presidential debate about healthcare is not about determining the most effective solution that provides the most efficient healthcare system for the needs of the United States; it is about convincing viewers that their plans are the most effective.  Ideology being more influential than pragmatic thinking exacerbates the decline and the greatest inhibitor of non-eristic debate.  How can we try to find the most effective solution for a problem if we are unable to consider any solutions or aspects outside our particular political ideology?        
             The most pragmatic elected public servants in the United States are mayors.  Mayors are the most pragmatic because they are closer to problems and their solutions to those problems than any other elected public servants.  Mayors are also the easiest to connect to their solutions to problems and thus, the easiest to hold accountable for the results of their solutions.  Mayors do not have the luxury of hiding behind vague existential threats like terrorism, communism, the religious right, the left wing agenda, or the right wing agenda as national politicians can.  Mayors are forced to find pragmatic solutions to problems that are the most effective because they are held to a greater degree of accountability.  They cannot blame their failures on others as easily or distract their constituents by evoking vague existential threats.  Mayors are often the most willing to adopt creative solutions to problems and work with opposing political parties.  Cory Booker, the former mayor of Newark, NJ is a prominent example of a pragmatic elected public servant.  Mayor Booker negotiated public sector cutbacks with unions, expanded government resources for those seeking work, and embraced public-private partnerships.  The incredible results in Newark during his tenure are sufficient evidence.  I think we should consider mayors as a more viable option in nationwide elections; their experience is more suited to pragmatic thinking.  Cities have become the true engines of policy innovation in the United States by embracing more objective pragmatic thinking.  We also need to hold our national elected officials more accountable as well.  
In an ideal situation, an elected public servant would be able to eliminate a government program simply because by objective measures it does not work.  As time elapses, original factors governing problems and their solutions change.  Economic conditions, demographics, and society change with time.  It is often the case that conditions outgrow a problem or outgrow the original solution to that problem rendering the solution and perhaps the problem irrelevant.  It would be nice if our elected public servants could eliminate a government program for those reasons.  Or perhaps, several academic studies have been conducted and they come to the conclusion, in an objective analysis, that the government program in question is ineffectual.  The pragmatic solution would be to eliminate the program.  Unfortunately, in our current world where ideology holds so much sway over our thinking, we cannot get rid of that government program.  That government program becomes more than just that specific program.  It becomes a representation of whether particular political ideologies are possible.  The right declares the death of government programs and how government policies are ineffectual and, as is often the case with the right, immoral.  The left holds up the program as a defense of government’s ability to help individuals and the role the government plays in solving problems in the economy and society.  In reality the operative question is the effectiveness of the government program in question, not whether government can work to solve problems or not.  I think it would be substantially more productive for the United States to view programs and solutions in this way, not as part of a larger ideology.  I would implore United States elected public servants to move towards a more objective, pragmatic, fact driven government.   

           



[1] I use the term elected public servant deliberately, instead of politician. 
[2] I mention general public debate, because political debate does not just occur on televised ‘debates’ or in Congress.  The vast majority of debate in the United States happens in coffee houses, dinner tables, parties and other public/private forms every day.  These debates are just as important as any televised debate on CSPAN.